LDS TEMPLES
COMPARED WITH THOSE OF BIBLICAL TIMES
"The greatest commandment given us, and made obligatory, is the
temple work in our own behalf and in behalf of our dead." (LDS
President and Prophet, Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of
Salvation, Volume 2, page 149)
The LDS church has temples all over the world, but they are not what
one would expect them to be. They are not used for worship services,
prayer and sin offerings, as they were in the Bible, but for work
for the dead and for ceremonies pertaining to life in the hereafter.
Entry into LDS temples is restricted to Mormons of good standing,
whose tithing payments are up to date (see the article on temple
recommends, entitled Mormonism and "Being
Worthy," a link for which is provided at the end of this
page).
The practice of having to prove one's personal worthiness to no
less than two Mormon authorities, before being permitted to attend
the LDS temple, shows us how vast the difference is between LDS
temples and those of the people of God during biblical times. The
biblical temple was the place where folk went to confess their sins
and to ask God's forgiveness, whereas the LDS temples are edifices
where only members of their church who have been pronounced by
their leadership as being "worthy" go, to make covenants
with God, perform ceremonies for the dead, and so on.
If a Mormon confessed that he was guilty of sin, he would not
be given a temple recommend, whereas in the Bible, the temple of
the people of God was used by those who were seeking forgiveness
for their sins (see Luke 18:10-14). Even unbelievers
(gentiles) were permitted to attend the temple for prayer and
worship. The place where Jesus drove the money changers out of
the temple was where the gentiles gathered to pray:
Jesus revealed His zeal for God first of all by cleansing the temple
(John 2:13-17). The priests had established a lucrative business of
exchanging foreign money for Jewish currency, and also selling the
animals needed for the sacrifices. No doubt, this "religious
market" began as a convenience for the Jews who came long
distances to worship in the temple; but in due time the
"convenience" became a business, not a ministry. The
tragedy is that this business was carried on in the court of the
Gentiles in the temple, the place where the Jews should have been
meeting the Gentiles and telling them about the one true God. Any
Gentile searching for truth would not likely find it among the
religious merchants in the temple. (The Bible Exposition
Commentary. Copyright © 1989 by Chariot Victor Publishing,
and imprint of Cook Communication Ministries. All rights reserved.
Used by permission.) (Emphasis by editor.)
Those who go through the LDS temple are sworn to secrecy about
what goes on inside, and are not permitted to discuss these things
even with their nearest and dearest. (Originally included in the
LDS temple ceremonies were many of the Freemasonry rites,
accompanied by some rather gory oaths about what would happen to
the participants if they ever broke their vow of secrecy.)
There has never ever been any secrecy practiced by the people
of God, either under the Old Covenant or under the New. The
biblical God is a deity of light, in whom there is no darkness,
and it follows that nothing that emanates from Him needs to be
done in secret. Truth doesn't need to be concealed, only
deception, or practices that are wrong or inappropriate.
Furthermore, there is no record of the primitive church ever
building temples or practicing any of the rites that the LDS
insists are vital to our salvation, because the temple and all
that went with it, belonged to the Old Covenant. Under the
New Covenant believers themselves are the temple of God (2
Corinthians 6:16).
And when it comes to temple marriages, which the LDS insists are
necessary in order to attain eternal life (see Doctrine and
Covenants 131:1-5), the only marriage attended by Christ that is
recorded by the gospels, was at Cana, where there was no temple
(John 2). Under the Old Covenant, the only temple belonging to
the people of God was in Jerusalem. And nobody was ever
married there. That's not what its purpose was.
Then too, the LDS temples have a molten, or brazen sea, that
is used for baptism by proxy of the dead, designed after the
pattern of the sea on the backs of the twelve oxen of Solomon's
temple. However, in Solomon's days the brazen sea was never ever
used for baptism, but for the priests to wash in (2 Chronicles
4:1-6).
Since the advent of the Internet, the LDS church has come under
a lot of open ridicule and criticism. Ex-Mormons have made
public some of the ridiculous LDS temple ceremonies (which had
included secret handshakes that they needed to learn so that
they could identify themselves to God). Because of the
overwhelmingly adverse response, the LDS church decided to
modify their ceremonies. Some have been done away with
altogether. But the oath of secrecy still applies, although
they have done away with the signs indicating disembowelment,
slit throats and so on, that would be the lot of the
participants in the event of these ceremonies being disclosed
to others.
It needs to be remembered that their original temple ceremonies
were claimed to have been given to the LDS by God Himself. But
it appears as though many of them came straight out of
Freemasonry, since they are either identical or very similar.
(The early LDS leadership were Freemasons.)
After Mormons have been through their temple ceremonies they are
expected to wear special underwear for the rest of their lives,
which they are told will protect them. This was never a practice
under either the Old or the New Covenants. And one can't help
wondering why people who claim that they are Christians should be
required to wear undergarments that are decorated with embossing
representing Freemason symbols, for protection. Mormons needs to
ask themselves what the spiritual powers behind these pagan
symbols are supposed to be protecting them from, bearing in mind
that pagan spiritual powers are opposed to the purposes of God.
In order for Mormons to fully understand just why their temples
don't fit in with either the New or the Old Covenants, we need to
go right back to when God commanded His chosen people to build
the first tabernacle, which was really just a portable temple.
THE OLD COVENANT TEMPLE
The temple, the Aaronic/Levitical priesthood and the
sacrificial system were all part and parcel of the Old Covenant
set up, and have no place in the New Covenant.
In the book of Exodus, God instructed Moses to lead the Hebrews
out of bondage in Egypt, into a land of their own. He promised
that He would be with them and instructed Moses to have a
portable tabernacle built that would represent His presence in
their midst as they journeyed. The pagans believed that Gods were
strictly territorial, and that each area or region had its own
specific God. But the God of Israel was teaching His people
that He wasn't confined to one area alone, and that His presence
would be with them no matter where they went.
When they eventually settled in the promised land of Israel, they
did away with the portable tabernacle and erected a permanent
temple in the city of Jerusalem.
We need to be clear that the sole reason for the existence, firstly
of the portable tabernacle and then later on of the permanent
temple, was so that the people could be assured that God's
presence was with them. The people went to the temple to pray
to, and to worship God. They also brought their sin offerings and
their sacrificial animals to the temple, because that's where His
presence was. However, they worshipped, prayed and sacrificed
directly outside the temple, in the courtyards, because the temple
wasn't for them. It was exclusively for the presence of God. Even
the king had to worship in the courts outside the actual
temple.
My soul longeth, yea, even fainteth for the courts of the Lord: my
heart and my flesh crieth out for the living God. (Psalm 84:2, KJV)
For a day in thy courts is better than a thousand. I had rather be
a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of
wickedness. (Psalm 84:10, KJV)
Give unto the Lord the glory due unto his name: bring an offering,
and come into his courts.(Psalm 96:8, KJV)
Enter into his gates with thanksgiving, and into his courts
with praise ..... (Psalm 100:4, KJV)
Inside the temple were two main compartments. The first was called
the holy place, and the other the holy of holies.
Only the Old Covenant priests (who were all blood descendants of
Levi, — see the link to the
article on the priesthood, provided at the end of this page) were
allowed to enter the Holy place. That was where they performed
routine duties such as tending to the golden lampstand, the table
of showbread and the golden altar of incense. Although these had
symbolic value, the essential function of the lampstand was the
illumination of the sanctuary. And the priests burned incense as
part of their duties. The showbread was replaced with fresh
loaves weekly, and the priests were permitted to eat the old
bread. (c/f International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Revised
Edition.)
The second compartment of the temple was the Holy of Holies, and
entrance was restricted to once a year, only by the High Priest,
in order to offer sacrificial blood for the atonement of the
nation. It was never ever used for any other purpose:
The generally accepted view is that the most holy place in the
tabernacle was a room of ten cubits (approximately 41/2 m., 15 ft.)
on a side. This supposition is strengthened by the cubic form of
the inner sanctuaries in both Solomon's and Ezekiel's temples.
The only furniture in the most holy place was the ark of the
covenant, which held the two tablets of the law (Ex 25:10-16).
The mercy seat, a slab of pure gold surmounted by two golden
cherubim, rested on top of the ark (vv. 17-22). Dividing the
most holy place from the holy place (the outer chamber) was a
curtain ornamented with figures of cherubim (26:31-33). Access to
the inner shrine, whether in tabernacle or temple, was forbidden
to all but the high priest who, on the annual Day of Atonement,
was allowed to enter bearing sacrificial blood (Lev 16; Heb 9:7).
(from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, revised edition,
Copyright 1979 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. All rights
reserved.)
Because the temple represented the presence of a holy God and the
question of sin had not yet been dealt with, ordinary folk weren't
allowed into either of the two compartments. So it was never ever
used either by the people or by the leadership for any purpose
whatsoever, and they had no access to it. No ceremonies of any
kind were performed in the temple. Other than to carry out the
duties mentioned above, the priests never entered the actual
temple either. It was there solely for the presence of God.
Secret temple ceremonies and temple work for the dead are
exclusively Mormon ideas and would have resulted in instantaneous
death for those concerned, if they had attempted such practices in
biblical times.
However, the temples of idolaters, of which there were many, were
used for all sorts of purposes by their religious devotees.
Because the Israelites were surrounded by idolaters who worshipped
many different Gods, each God having his own temple, they were
instructed never to build more than one temple for themselves.
Otherwise there would be a very real danger that they could fall
into the trap of believing that there was more than one God.
That's why the Jews had to make pilgrimages to Jerusalem from all
over the world to their one and only temple at times like the
Passover. (The LDS has many temples, and is in the process of
building even more. But building temples wherever they felt they
were necessary for their purposes was a practice of pagan
believers, never ever of the people of God. They were permitted
to have only one temple at a time.)
History reveals that the only time the people of God had more than
one temple was for a period after Solomon's death, when the
kingdom had split into two. And that signalled the beginning of
their idolatry. Their defeat by their enemies, captivity and
dispersion followed.
Regarding LDS claims that their specifically Mormon temple
practices are missing from the Bible because they were removed by
evil people, one shouldn't forget that the Jewish nation didn't
only practice their religion straight out of the then recorded
scriptures. They also did so from memory. They explained it all to
their children orally, over and over again. So every Jew, old and
young alike, knew these things off by heart. Someone, somewhere,
would have objected if such important practices had been removed
from the scriptures. It would have caused an almighty uproar with
repercussions that would still have been heard today. So Mormons
may rest assured that nothing was ever taken from the original
temple practices. That was a story invented to cover up the fact
that Mormonism is an unbiblical religion.
There has never ever been any evidence discovered anywhere, in
any form, of any religion remotely resembling Mormonism in their
teachings or their temple practices prior to the time when Joseph
Smith founded the Mormon church.
THE RATIFICATION OF THE NEW COVENANT
Christ's shed blood ratified the New Covenant and thereby
rendered the Old Covenant with its temple, priesthood and
sacrificial system, obsolete.
In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now
that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
(Hebrews 8:13, KJV).
No longer would God's presence dwell in a temple made with human
hands as believers themselves would become the temple of God:
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of
God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall
God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
(1 Corinthians 3:16-17, KJV)
And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are
the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in
them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be
my people. (2 Corinthians 6:16, KJV)
At the moment of Christ's death the New Covenant was ushered in, and
the curtain that had partitioned the Holy of Holies off from the
rest of the temple ripped into two. This was a miraculous, Divine
indication that Christ's vicarious death had provided direct access
for man into the presence of a holy God. (The historian Josephus
records that this curtain was so strong that not even horses tied
to each side could tear it apart. And as it was renewed every year,
it was always in perfect condition.)
And Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost. And the
veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.
(Mark.15:37-38, KJV)
Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.
Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by
the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath
consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh;
And having an high priest [Christ] over the house of God; Let us
draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our
hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed
with pure water. (Hebrews 10:18-22, KJV).
Under the New Covenant the believer himself becomes the temple of
God, through the indwelling of God's Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians
3:16, 6:19, Ephesians 2:19-22). So it's no longer necessary to have
temples or tabernacles made with hands. There is no record of
the early church ever building a temple, because they themselves
were the temple of God:
In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God
through the Spirit. (Ephesians 2:22, KJV)
Apart from the one and only Jewish Old Covenant temple in Jerusalem,
the only other temples mentioned in the New Testament were those
belonging to idolaters.
In the very early days the Christian believers (who were Jews) did
sometimes worship in the courtyard of the Jewish temple, but only
because that was where all the Jews gathered, and it gave them an
opportunity to preach to their unsaved brethren about Jesus being
their long awaited Messiah. Don't forget that the Jews worship on a
Saturday, whereas the New Covenant day of worship is Sunday, the
day the Lord rose from the dead. Jews were permitted to preach in
the temple courtyard; and the apostles, being Jews, took advantage
of this. Their mission was firstly to preach Christ to the Jewish
nation, and then to the gentiles. The Jews were still under their
Old Covenant of Law, as in the main they hadn't accepted Jesus as
the Messiah, and that is why they worshipped at the temple.
The temple was a part of the Old Covenant set up, not the
New.
As a Christian, when I attend a church service I don't go there to
meet with God. He comes with me, because His presence dwells
within me. I am His temple. He's with me all the time, wherever I
go, and has promised that He'll never leave me or forsake me
(Hebrews 13:5).
Concerning the mention of the temple in heaven, in the book of
Revelation, Mormons need to remember firstly that this is a highly
symbolic book, and secondly, throughout the Bible the place where
the presence of God dwells, even within believers, is always called
the temple of God. John was having a vision of heaven, where God's
presence dwelt, so in biblical parlance, heaven was the temple of
God. This is clarified in the following verse concerning the
heavenly Jerusalem. (Jerusalem was always the place where the
temple was situated):
And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb
are the temple of it. And the city had no need of the sun, neither
of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it,
and the Lamb is the light thereof. (Revelation 21:22-23, KJV)
This fits in with the fact that the temple was intended solely to
represent the presence of God. The Bible is the most amazing book.
Although it has been recorded by a great many different writers over
a very long time period, everything fits together so perfectly, that
it just has to have been supernaturally inspired.
HISTORICAL EVIDENCE THAT LDS TEMPLES ARE UNBIBLICAL
Alfred Edersheim was a historian of note. Amongst his highly respected
works were History of the Jewish Nation; The Temple and Its
Ministry and Services at the Time of Jesus Christ; Bible History
(comprising seven volumes), Sketches of Jewish Social Life in the
Days of Christ; and The Life and Times of Jesus the
Messiah. In his book on the temple, in chapter 16, Edersheim
tells us that once a year, on the Day of Atonement, the High Priest
(who represented the people) would go into the temple, and pray as
follows:
Ah, JEHOVAH! I have committed iniquity; I have transgressed; I have
sinned — and my house. Oh, then, JEHOVAH, I entreat Thee,
cover over [atone for, let there be atonement for] the iniquities,
the transgressions, and the sins which I have committed,
transgressed, and sinned before Thee, — I and my house as it
is written in the law of Moses, Thy servant: "For, on that day
will He cover over (atone) for you to make you clean; from all your
transgressions before JEHOVAH ye shall be cleansed."
This was a prayer of a man who was humbled by his sin, not of
someone who was considered either by himself or by others, to be
worthy. He knew very well that both he, and those whom he
represented, were absolutely unworthy. That's why he went to the
temple — to ask for forgiveness for their sins. On the other
hand, Mormons have to be declared worthy before they are permitted
to go to their temple.
Mormon beliefs and practices do not fit in either with what the
Bible teaches or with the beliefs and practices of the primitive
church.
SYMBOLISM USED IN MORMON TEMPLES
It is a well recorded fact that Joseph Smith came from an occultic
background. He freely admitted that he had received his revelations
from God through an occultic stone, and it is common knowledge that
he had "translated" the Book of Mormon without even
looking at the engravings on the supposed gold plates. Instead
they were hidden away out of sight, whilst he dictated the words
that he said he saw coming out of his occultic stone. (See
The Book of Mormon Witnesses Who Never Saw the
Gold Plates .)
Joseph was a Freemason, as were others in the early LDS
leadership, and they brought many of the Masonic secret ceremonies
and symbols with them into the Mormon temple setup.
Freemasonry is a brotherhood embracing all religions. Their symbol
of a compass and square along with any book of 'scripture' such as
the Koran, the Vedas, the Bible, or whatever, form the Three
Great Lights of Masonry that represent pagan solar gods. And in
spite of their pagan connotations, the LDS temples are decorated
with Masonic symbols. To complete the picture of pagan solar
worship, the external masonry is emblazoned with stars, planets
and the like. Their actual placement and the direction they face
has a great deal of significance. It reveals that they weren't
just randomly included as decoration, but that they have a special
meaning.
Masons worship a god whom they call "the Great Architect of
the Universe," symbolized by the same all seeing eye that
the ancient Egyptians used to represent their pagan god, Osiris.
This all seeing eye is also regarded by Satanists as the symbol
of Lucifer. Notwithstanding this, it is featured on the external
masonry of the LDS temple. And the inverted pentagram used in
Satan worship is also displayed on the external facade. But
the Christian symbol of the cross has been banned from all their
premises, including their temple premises.
(The information concerning the external facade of the LDS temple
was gleaned from the book, "Whited Sepulchers, the Hidden
Language of the Mormon Temple," by William J. Schnoebelen
and James R. Spencer.)
Mormons are taught to abhor the symbol of the cross, and their
women do not wear a crucifix. The LDS's outright rejection of
the symbol of the cross and their unease when it is displayed
was brought home to me after the death of my oldest Mormon
brother. A memorial service was held in the [Christian] chapel
of the retirement home where he had died. As the Mormon bishop
began the service he pointed to the cross embossed on the front
of the pulpit and remarked that this would never have been
allowed in a Mormon chapel. But in saying that, he shot himself
in the foot, so to speak. There were many non-Mormon folk in
the congregation who had been under the impression that
Mormonism was an "acceptable variation of
Christianity." That very day they were convinced
otherwise by that one telling remark made by the LDS bishop.
Mormonism is not Christianity.
A Christian church would never, ever ban the symbol of a cross
on their premises.
For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness;
but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (1 Corinthians
1:18, KJV)
Although it is understood that members of the LDS church are
unaware of how deeply their religion has been affected by pagan,
occultic and satanic influences, they need to come to the
realization that Mormonism was formulated by an early leadership
who did know.
LDS doctrines and teachings have been designed in such a way that
their followers will never find God's way of salvation for mankind.
To top it all, Mormons have been taught that the Bible, the very
weapon that God gave us to protect ourselves from spiritual
deception, is unreliable and full of errors and omissions. So
they have no standard of truth against which to judge the
correctness or otherwise of LDS doctrine. (They are taught to
gauge the accuracy of the Bible by comparing it with their own
scriptures.) Joseph Smith even wrote his own version of sections
that he disagreed with in the Bible, and the LDS church has taken
the liberty of including many of his amendments as footnotes in
their printing of the King James Version. (See the article
Joseph Smith's Inspired Translation of the
Bible .)
The author is not denigrating Mormons or the Mormon way of life.
Many of the people I love best in the world are Mormons. And they
are gentle, sincere and lovely people. But that hasn't
prevented them from being spiritually deceived.
Apart from their stance on morality, Mormonism bears no resemblance
to biblical Christianity. If it had, the LDS leadership would have
ensured that their buildings displayed some sort of Christian
symbolism. There are a great many other Christian symbols that they
could have used in place of the cross, seeing that offends them so
much. There is the alpha and the omega sign, the lamb symbolizing
Christ, the dove symbolizing the Holy Spirit, the burning bush,
the seven branched candlestick, the fish, and oh, the list goes on
and on. But instead the LDS leadership deliberately chose symbols
from paganism, astrology and Satanism. And they banned the cross.
My heart and my prayers are with you as you read this article.
Should you desire to contact me, you are welcome to do so at
response@bibtruth.com
The first link given below will take you to an article that
discusses the LDS's abhorrence of the symbol of the cross, and the
second to an article about the Mormon worthiness test that has to
be passed in order to be able to enter their temple, and the third
is on the priesthood:
Mormon Opposition to the Cross
Mormonism and "Being Worthy"
The LDS Priesthood is Unbiblical
To access a comprehensive index of articles comparing various
aspects of Mormonism with what the Bible teaches, click on the
"home" button at the bottom of this page.
Copyright 2007 by Mormonism and Biblical Truth. All rights
reserved.